Man in the Attic

Man in the Attic(1953)

12/23/1953 (US)Thriller, Crime, Horror1h 22m
5.4

"The Life...The Loves...The Crimes of Jack the Ripper!"

Overview

London, 1888: on the night of the third Jack the Ripper killing, soft-spoken Mr. Slade, a research pathologist, takes lodgings with the Harleys, including a gloomy attic room for "experiments." Mrs. Harley finds Slade odd and increasingly suspects the worst; her niece Lily (star of a decidedly Parisian stage revue) finds him interesting and increasingly attractive. Is Lily in danger, or are her mother's suspicions merely a red herring?

Robert Presnell Jr.

Screenplay

Hugo Fregonese

Director

Barré Lyndon

Screenplay

Where to Watch

Stream

Amazon Prime Video
MGM Plus Roku Premium Channel
MGM Plus
IndieFlix
Cultpix
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
IndieFlix Shorts Amazon Channel
Bloodstream

Rent

Amazon Video

Buy

Amazon Video

Powered by JustWatch

Popularity Trend

Last 30 Days
This chart shows the popularity trend over the past 30 days.

Media

Man in the Attic (1953) - Trailer

Man in the Attic (1953) - Trailer

Trailer

Social

C
A review by CinemaSerf
6.0

Written on June 22, 2022

Jack Palance is "Slade", a curiously enigmatic stranger who takes rooms in the home of the "Harley" family. It's at the height of the paranoia in Victorian London surrounding the "Jack the Ripper" killings and as our story develops, both "Mrs. Harley" (Frances Bavier) and the audience begin to suspect that our reclusive visitor may well have a secret to keep. Those suspicions only intensify when he takes a shine to her actress niece "Lily" (Constance Smith) and we really do wonder if she is soon to be toast, too! Hugo Fregonese does manage to build a little menace into this: the dark eerie settings, the foggy London scenes all add a richness to the drama. Palance, however, is as wooden as a picket fence; he brings very little to his part. Indeed, aside from an amiable few scenes from Rhys Williams as "Harley", the acting is all a bit dry and stagey and that drags the whole thing down rather. It is still quite watchable, though, but with a better actor in the lead it could have been much more intriguing and I think I preferred "The Lodger" (1944).