King Kong

King Kong(1933)

NR
03/15/1933 (US)Adventure, Fantasy, Horror1h 44m
7.6

"Beauty conquered the beast!"

Overview

Adventurous filmmaker Carl Denham sets out to produce a motion picture unlike anything the world has seen before. Alongside his leading lady Ann Darrow and his first mate Jack Driscoll, they arrive on an island and discover a legendary creature said to be neither beast nor man. Denham captures the monster to be displayed on Broadway as King Kong, the eighth wonder of the world.

Ruth Rose

Screenplay

James Ashmore Creelman

Screenplay

Ernest B. Schoedsack

Director

Merian C. Cooper

Director

Leon Gordon

Writer

Edgar Wallace

Story

Merian C. Cooper

Story

Where to Watch

Rent

Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Spectrum On Demand

Buy

Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home

Powered by JustWatch

Popularity Trend

Last 30 Days
This chart shows the popularity trend over the past 30 days.

Part of the King Kong (1933) Collection

A giant monster adventure film series about a gigantic island-dwelling ape creature called Kong and it's sequel about Kong's son.

Media

Trailer

Trailer

Trailer

King Kong Trailer (1933)

King Kong Trailer (1933)

Trailer

Kong Breaks Loose | Empire State Building FULL SCENE

Kong Breaks Loose | Empire State Building FULL SCENE

Clip

King Kong (1933) - The Bride of Kong Scene (1/10) | Movieclips

King Kong (1933) - The Bride of Kong Scene (1/10) | Movieclips

Clip

Cameras Rolling On Kong

Cameras Rolling On Kong

Featurette

Social

T
A review by tmdb27219454
10.0

Written on August 2, 2019

In watching this movie, and I'm talking about actually scrutinizing it intently, I was shocked at the amount and the extremity of the violence that was in the picture. Natives were being bitten, swallowed and purposely stepped upon by Kong. The sailors were chased, trampled and eaten by the dinosaurs and then we have all the New York City violence on top of it all where Kong tosses a woman to her death and bites on a bystander.

Also, for it being an 85+ year old movie, the special effects STILL stand up rather well and STILL look convincingly realistic. In fact, I believe these FX are of a better quality than the 1976 remake and even comes close to the 2005 CGI version.

If you've never seen this classic, mostly because "who would want to watch that old-style claymation" or you can't watch anything not "in Living Color," you really need to give this one a try. For those of you that have seen it, let me urge you to rewatch it, possibly with some newly-opened eyes.