Reds(1981)
PG
12/25/1981 (US)Drama, History, Romance3h 15m6.9
"Not since Gone with the Wind has there been a great romantic epic like it!"
Overview
An account of the revolutionary years of the legendary American journalist John Reed, who shared his adventurous professional life with his radical commitment to the socialist revolution in Russia, his dream of spreading its principles among the members of the American working class, and his troubled romantic relationship with the writer Louise Bryant.
Warren Beatty
Director
Warren Beatty
Screenplay
Trevor Griffiths
Screenplay
Top Billed Cast
Where to Watch
Rent
Buy
Powered by JustWatch
Popularity Trend
Last 30 Days
This chart shows the popularity trend over the past 30 days.
Media
Trailer
Trailer
Social
G
A review by GenerationofSwine
1.0
Written on January 12, 2023
this is about John Reed, right? The guy that road with Poncho Villa and wrote "Insurgent Mexico" as he covered that Civil War from the front line?
That is an interesting man. That is a daring man. Agree with his politics or not, that is someone that a movie SHOULD be made about.
But this isn't about "Insurgent Mexico" it's about his other book, "10 Days that Shook the World," the book where he wrote about something that he didn't really understand completely and was denied witness to, well, horrific mass killings.
But, you know the Russian Revolution is EXTREMELY interesting isn't it? Even if he was spoon-fed what he wrote, just being there to cover that would make for one interesting film too wouldn't it?
Only... it's not really about that either is it?
It's kind of about John Reed not doing anything too exciting, like the took the parts of his life that you would WANT to see a movie about, and decided NOT to make the movie about those parts.
And the result is that, well, honestly, it's boring.
And you are left wondering "How could someone make a boring movie about John Reed?"
And unfortunately you walk away from it having found out the answer to that question: "By making a movie about ONLY the boring parts of his life."
That is an interesting man. That is a daring man. Agree with his politics or not, that is someone that a movie SHOULD be made about.
But this isn't about "Insurgent Mexico" it's about his other book, "10 Days that Shook the World," the book where he wrote about something that he didn't really understand completely and was denied witness to, well, horrific mass killings.
But, you know the Russian Revolution is EXTREMELY interesting isn't it? Even if he was spoon-fed what he wrote, just being there to cover that would make for one interesting film too wouldn't it?
Only... it's not really about that either is it?
It's kind of about John Reed not doing anything too exciting, like the took the parts of his life that you would WANT to see a movie about, and decided NOT to make the movie about those parts.
And the result is that, well, honestly, it's boring.
And you are left wondering "How could someone make a boring movie about John Reed?"
And unfortunately you walk away from it having found out the answer to that question: "By making a movie about ONLY the boring parts of his life."
